Printer-Based MFPs vs. Copier-Based MFPs
Historically copiers and printers were manufactured from different technology platforms and did different functions, but today that line has blurred with respect to many of the features that users typically use. Two products that offer the same print speed may be based on very different lineage, namely printer or copier.
The multifunction printer base is growing, especially in the mid-speed range of 45 to 50 ppm. Multifunction printers have a number of advantages over copier-based MFPs, especially in relation to cost savings. For example, the acquisition cost of a printer-based MFP is much less than that of a copier-based MFP. In addition, since the printers do not require scheduled maintenance, buyers are given the flexibility of not necessarily having to commit to ongoing and often expensive service contracts. Other advantages include a generally smaller footprint.
There are drawbacks as well, however. For instance, the majority of printer-based MFPs can only handle up to legal-size (8 ½" x 14") output and scanning, not ledger size (11" x 17"). And while the acquisition cost of a printer-based MFP is much lower than a copier-based MFP, the supplies cost per page is higher due to their user-replaceable supplies that include drums and fusers, in addition to toner. Printer-based MFPs also lack more robust finishing capabilities such as booklet making.
The right choice for you between a printer-based MFP and copier-based MFP depends on your monthly usage needs.
For more on this topic, click here.